Amid the rollout of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, France has threatened to block crypto firms licensed elsewhere in Europe from operating domestically. On September 15, France’s financial regulator, the AMF, flagged concerns about regulatory arbitrage and lax supervision in member states, a move that could reshuffle how issuers operate across borders.
MiCA Enforcement & National Pushback
MiCA, which took effect earlier this year, grants licenses in one EU country the ability to “passport” across others. However, inconsistent licensing standards have led France, Italy, and Austria to call for oversight of major crypto firms to shift to ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority). The French AMF stated that some issuers are exploiting gaps in regulation by using lenient jurisdictions such as Malta.
Impact on Firms & Market Dynamics
If France moves forward with blocking passported licenses, crypto firms could face significant operational hurdles. Those relying on countries with cheaper or faster licensing processes may be forced either to apply for licenses directly in France or to adapt to stricter supervisory requirements. Companies with weak compliance infrastructure could struggle. Conversely, stronger players may benefit through competitive advantage, putting regulatory compliance and corporate governance in sharper focus for investors.
Investor Sentiment & Regulatory Uncertainty
Certainty in regulation has become a critical factor for crypto investors. The fear of sudden regulatory changes—such as inter-state blocks or revocation of permissions—can lead to volatility in valuation and trading volumes. Firms publicly emphasizing compliance or auditing standards may attract capital, whereas those with opacity come under pressure. This dynamic is especially relevant for cross-border service providers, exchanges, and stablecoin issuers.
Broader Implications & Sectoral Ripple Effects
If France’s push to centralize supervision through ESMA wins traction, we could see stronger harmonization of licensing rules, enforcement norms, and cybersecurity/custodial standards across the EU. Unclear or divergent regulatory implementation has so far been a deterrent for institutional capital. A more unified regulatory environment would likely encourage cross-border investment and facilitate larger international projects, albeit potentially at the cost of increased compliance costs for smaller operators.
Comparison, examination, and analysis between investment houses
Leave your details, and an expert from our team will get back to you as soon as possible
Leave a comment