Key Points
- Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor proposed a “bill of digital rights” covering the creation, issuance, custody, transfer and use of digital assets.
- Saylor argued that AI-driven productivity gains will require more flexible capital markets and new ways for businesses to raise funding.
- He also called for digital dollars to compete on yield and speed, while arguing that restrictive rules could limit the economic potential of emerging technologies.
Saylor Proposes Five Digital Asset Rights
Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy and co-founder of the company, has outlined a framework he says could help support economic growth as artificial intelligence and digital assets reshape financial markets.
In an essay published on X, Saylor argued that the emerging digital economy needs a “bill of digital rights” rather than restrictions that could limit how people and companies create and use digital assets.
His proposed framework centers on five fundamental freedoms. They include the ability to create digital assets, issue them to the market to finance businesses and productivity, hold them through a chosen custodian, transfer them between people and organizations, and use them for spending, investment, income generation and borrowing.
Saylor said these rights should apply to individuals and businesses alike.
Digital Assets and the Next Generation of Companies
Saylor connected the proposed framework to the broader economic impact of artificial intelligence.
He argued that AI could significantly increase production while simultaneously automating jobs and making some existing products and business models obsolete. In his view, maintaining future prosperity will therefore require the creation of new businesses and economic opportunities at a faster pace.
“Our ambition should be to enable 10 million new companies to raise capital,” Saylor wrote.
The argument places digital assets within a broader capital-formation framework rather than treating them solely as alternative investments. Easier issuance and transfer of digital assets, under Saylor’s proposal, could give businesses additional mechanisms for raising and deploying capital.
Saylor also argued that restricting the usefulness of an asset can reduce its broader economic potential because an asset’s value is linked to what its owner is permitted to do with it.
Strategy Continues Bitcoin Accumulation
Saylor’s comments come as Strategy continues to expand its Bitcoin holdings.
The company recently resumed Bitcoin purchases after a two-week pause, acquiring 950 BTC for approximately $75.7 million at an average price of $79,670 per Bitcoin.
The purchase brought Strategy’s reported holdings to 846,000 BTC, acquired for approximately $63.8 billion at an average cost of $75,416 per BTC. Bitcoin was trading near $84,523 when the source article was published.
Strategy remains one of the largest corporate holders of Bitcoin, making Saylor’s broader arguments about digital asset ownership and capital markets particularly relevant to the company’s own treasury strategy.
Saylor Calls for Competition Among Digital Dollars
Saylor also addressed the development of digital dollars, arguing that they should be allowed to compete based on factors such as yield and transaction speed.
He said digital dollars should be capable of moving at the “speed of light” and be made available through the devices and applications consumers already use. In his framework, banks, financial technology companies and technology platforms could all play roles in distributing digital dollar products.
The proposal reflects a broader debate over how digital forms of money could interact with existing financial institutions and payment infrastructure.
Saylor argued that protecting established business models while making it difficult for new models to obtain financing could leave the economy less prepared for technological change.
He concluded that where existing laws prevent digital financial products from competing or developing, those laws should be reconsidered.
Outlook
Saylor’s proposal places digital asset rights, capital formation and digital money within a broader discussion about how financial infrastructure may evolve alongside artificial intelligence. His framework emphasizes greater freedom to create, issue, hold, transfer and use digital assets, while also calling for competition among digital-dollar systems. Whether such principles translate into policy will depend on how regulators and lawmakers approach digital assets, capital markets and financial innovation.
Comparison, examination, and analysis between investment houses
Leave your details, and an expert from our team will get back to you as soon as possible
